Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2016 19:37:13 GMT -5
TGC must really be winding down. You guys are expending way too much time on this discussion. Back to golf!
|
|
|
|
Post by nevadaballin on Nov 17, 2016 3:14:53 GMT -5
TGC must really be winding down. You guys are expending way too much time on this discussion. Back to golf! It's all good. The only people who come in this thread are those who want to discuss or want to read what we are talking about. |
|
|
|
Post by mcbogga on Nov 17, 2016 5:22:14 GMT -5
I wonder if Trump is a grid or no grid guy?
|
|
|
|
Post by boffo on Nov 17, 2016 11:14:20 GMT -5
I wonder if Trump is a grid or no grid guy? This is Trump you're talking about. Of course he is a grid guy but he only uses the best grid. An amazing grid. It's a really, really good grid. Compared to other grids his grid is incredible. No one else has a grid like his. |
|
|
|
Post by mcbogga on Nov 17, 2016 18:23:19 GMT -5
I wonder if Trump is a grid or no grid guy? This is Trump you're talking about. Of course he is a grid guy but he only uses the best grid. An amazing grid. It's a really, really good grid. Compared to other grids his grid is incredible. No one else has a grid like his. Definitely. It's amazing! |
|
|
|
Post by karma4u on Nov 18, 2016 1:11:00 GMT -5
Dayum, looks like the "grizzly madam" could be back soon...kinda makes me want to go git one of them helichopter things and hunt some cariboo....  Seriously, that was just my weak attempt at humor...it's just that she stirs that kinda stuff in me...... She never stirred me like she did some other older white dudes...when she totally messed up McCain...  |
|
|
|
Post by nevadaballin on Nov 23, 2016 6:03:49 GMT -5
Trump moving back to his liberal roots with a twist of wtf?
Curious how his supporters are viewing some of the severe waffling....
|
|
|
|
Post by tastegw on Nov 23, 2016 6:23:48 GMT -5
You are always going to get folks like Bannon in there. I'm not saying exactly like him but the most powerful person in Obama's administration is none other than Valerie Jarred. She was highly controversial coming in, never had to go through confirmation and is arguably more powerful than Biden, Kerry, Reid and Pelosi combined. Van Jones was another extremely controversial person who came in. He made a few off colour remarks and was promptly forced to resign. ^^^^ This post right here is part of the a huge general problem in this country. The willingness to normalize bad choices because someone else may have made bad choices in the past. We see it constantly when someone is questioned about what they have done. Instead of justifying or answering to their actions with solid reason, the comeback is always "well those other guys did this and had that". This needs to stop and true accountability needs to start. And it doesn't start with "well the other guys need to be accountable first". No, they don't. The person at the top needs to be the one to start it, regardless of those before him. while i agree nevada, its also a two way street, you did not seen the dems come out against any of Obama's picks, no matter how wrong they were, but they are very quick to point out the bad picks of a republican, this goes round on both sides. its dirty politics to point out the other sides weaknesses when your side has the same weaknesses and you do and say nothing about it. we need to clean house across the entire board, starting from the ground up and the top down, meet in the middle and get some rubberband action going on to make sure it stays clean. until then, its just going to be dirty politics, one side will blast the other and the other side with blast back, both sides double talking and being total hypocrites. but that is my public view, ill tell you my private view later on. |
|
|
|
Post by nevadaballin on Nov 23, 2016 13:54:28 GMT -5
^^^^ This post right here is part of the a huge general problem in this country. The willingness to normalize bad choices because someone else may have made bad choices in the past. We see it constantly when someone is questioned about what they have done. Instead of justifying or answering to their actions with solid reason, the comeback is always "well those other guys did this and had that". This needs to stop and true accountability needs to start. And it doesn't start with "well the other guys need to be accountable first". No, they don't. The person at the top needs to be the one to start it, regardless of those before him. while i agree nevada, its also a two way street, you did not seen the dems come out against any of Obama's picks, no matter how wrong they were, but they are very quick to point out the bad picks of a republican, this goes round on both sides. its dirty politics to point out the other sides weaknesses when your side has the same weaknesses and you do and say nothing about it. we need to clean house across the entire board, starting from the ground up and the top down, meet in the middle and get some rubberband action going on to make sure it stays clean. until then, its just going to be dirty politics, one side will blast the other and the other side with blast back, both sides double talking and being total hypocrites. but that is my public view, ill tell you my private view later on. Understand that what I said was across the board. Everytime something is criticized, the answer always seems to be "well those guys did this" as if that makes it ok. It does not. And you just did it again. I'm not clear if the "when your side has the same weaknesses and you do and say nothing about it." was directly pointed at me. I don't have a side. I'm not democrat or a republican. My points of view come from "do what is right for the sake of doing what is right". As for cleaning house, that's difficult to do when you are using a dirty mop. I know it's early and I'm willing to let the clown car finish loading, but so far I'm not seeing anything that indicates there is any swamp draining. Public view vs private view. I love it. I have some. Everyone does. Example > abortion. Personally not something I support but if I'm someone who'd be legislating public policy then Roe vs Wade would stand. |
|
|
|
Post by nevadaballin on May 17, 2017 12:41:02 GMT -5
You are missing the big picture. If he doesn't pardon her now, then when Trump gets in he could easily charge her with a slew of things and she would have no where to run or hide. She wouldn't have a Democrat Department of Justice and Attorney General or a President that could pardon her. Trump even ran on the fact that when he got in he would re-open the investigation on her with HIS Attorney General. So if Obama doesn't pardon her, she absolutely could end up in jail. And yes, Obama could pardon her without ever being charged against future potential indictments. This is what Ford did with Nixon. Nixon's articles of Impeachment were never finalized, he resigned before they were voted on in the House, nor had he been criminally yet. Ford pardoned him so he would never be charged with any crimes associated with his Presidency. Yea but Nixon was a POTUS although I could see Obama possibly doing that her and using that as precedent. Keep in mind, it isn't up to Trump to prosecute her. He isn't King of America. He may appoint the Pilsbury dough boy Christie to lead the Justice Dept but if Comey is correct and there isn't enough to convict her, then Trump starts out with pie on the face and a huge disappointment to his cult. Nixon segue to Wikileaks... i have found it interesting that only DNC emails were hacked and released. More interesting that Giuliani is involved in a cyber security company and has always hinted at upcoming things against Clinton. I just smell a modern-day Watergate with all of this.I had to revisit this comment i made on Nov 9th of last year (bolded). Not that I foresaw anything that has happened since but moreso than just the feeling I had at the time of the email hacks and Russian involvement. Man have things snowballed since then. For once I'd like to see Congress get together as one, put their "political party" BS aside. Get a real independent investigation of a proper timeline and evidence, then make fair & just decisions solely based on those discoveries. With that, everyone involved needs to put all cards on the table. And I still think Giuliani is involved in this mess somewhere. Just a gut feeling. |
|
|
|
Post by jacobkessler on May 17, 2017 15:01:06 GMT -5
I vote for an impeachment.
|
|
reebdoog
TGCT Design Competition Directors
Posts: 2,742 
TGCT Name: Brian Jeffords
Tour: CC-Pro
|
Post by reebdoog on May 17, 2017 20:45:34 GMT -5
yeah I'll say it's going about exactly like I thought so far...
|
|
|
|
Post by karma4u on May 18, 2017 18:46:07 GMT -5
Was a truly amazing election........
"Watergate" is not even close to the corruption that is involved here...
"Gullible" is the only good word, that can describe so many voters on both sides........
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 18, 2017 20:27:36 GMT -5
I can't wait for the day when people wake up and stop depending on politicians to solve thier problems.
Get it done
|
|
