|
|
Post by dh-nufc on Jan 15, 2016 3:56:32 GMT -5
263rd from 202nd. However 203rd excluding the inactives so I guess I've not moved much haha. Great that web and cc players are not getting as much now. Thanks a lot Luke.  I've been thinking about this and for me it's all great. (Even though I moved down from 337 to 518 or 371 inc inactive players) I was unsure about the inactive players but they will all slowly move down and even if players around my level have an average week they will probably climb the rankings a bit, it gives you some false hope which we all need at some point! I found that when selecting inactive players it simply removed them from the list as you would expect. Your WGR doesn't change though so if you want to know where you are with active players you need to filter and then see which page you are on and then count where you are in the page. |
|
|
|
Post by Morgan-esque on Jan 15, 2016 4:02:31 GMT -5
So when it comes to selectingTop X amount from WGR for tournaments, will this be based on the Active or Inactive list? (Sorry if it's already been answered)
|
|
|
|
Post by TimB on Jan 15, 2016 4:12:28 GMT -5
How/where do you find the rankings by country? Ranked 60th out of active Canadians..so there's that I guess  |
|
|
|
Post by ABU_Bear on Jan 15, 2016 4:16:38 GMT -5
How/where do you find the rankings by country? Ranked 60th out of active Canadians..so there's that I guess I just filtered to Canadians.....you're 58th  |
|
|
|
Post by TimB on Jan 15, 2016 4:18:54 GMT -5
oh ok thanks I did that myself, but unless I'm missing something I had to manually count. Would be kind of nice to have the position next to your name
|
|
|
|
Post by ABU_Bear on Jan 15, 2016 4:21:01 GMT -5
oh ok thanks I did that myself, but unless I'm missing something I had to manually count. Would be kind of nice to have the position next to your name and evidently my counting is about as good as my game...cuz I think I'm actually in the 90's somewhere..LMAO..which would put you high 80's. Oh well...I'll just have to win a few more tournaments...I was really hoping it didn't have to come to this..but....whatcha gonna do |
|
|
|
Post by TimB on Jan 15, 2016 4:22:41 GMT -5
I blame it on time of day. I counted 3 times and never got the same number twice by time I scrolled down and caught up lol
|
|
|
|
Post by dh-nufc on Jan 15, 2016 4:29:18 GMT -5
Something is still a little off, I'm 40th on the rankings and 40th still on the active list with Sloaner and DLW coming out... Hmmmmm Should I not be 38th on the active list??? Not sure what's going on, who's jumped in to replace the 2 inactives The ranking doesn't change when your filter. As far as I can see you have to manually count your position within the page. |
|
|
|
Post by CongoGB on Jan 15, 2016 4:34:46 GMT -5
Ouch - from 43 to 66, although I do think it better reflects the rankings now. Also means I'll need to pick up my game over the next few weeks to try to make the WGC events and The Masters.
Nice one guys - love the constant development!
|
|
|
|
Post by edi_vedder on Jan 15, 2016 5:23:46 GMT -5
Does this overhaul have any affect on the Ryder Cup Standings, or is it independent of that/those change(s)?
|
|
|
|
Post by ijs1543 on Jan 15, 2016 5:26:06 GMT -5
loving the new page for wgr great job guys
my only criticism would come about the inactive players seem to have been rewarded for not
playing the game in 3 months, if I look a sloaner he won 3/4 times 3 months ago and has 24 points
smurf has won 6 times but is only on the same points? its like brian has been punished for playing
15 more events than him? struggling 2 understand just my opinion but would not want to punish people
for grinding all year but reward people who left.
|
|
|
|
Post by smurfblade88 on Jan 15, 2016 5:53:07 GMT -5
loving the new page for wgr great job guys my only criticism would come about the inactive players seem to have been rewarded for not playing the game in 3 months, if I look a sloaner he won 3/4 times 3 months ago and has 24 points smurf has won 6 times but is only on the same points? its like brian has been punished for playing 15 more events than him? struggling 2 understand just my opinion but would not want to punish people for grinding all year but reward people who left. Ye!!...what Ian said....lol |
|
|
|
Post by boomboom on Jan 15, 2016 5:55:02 GMT -5
It seems better to rank who is playing better now rather then who played better then. It won't be such a slog and slow climb for new players. It provides incentive to move up tours. It better rewards solid, consistent, recent and steady week after week play. Sorry I can't see any downside here.
|
|
|
|
Post by ijs1543 on Jan 15, 2016 5:58:31 GMT -5
It seems better to rank who is playing better now rather then who played better then. It won't be such a slog and slow climb for new players. It provides incentive to move up tours. It better rewards solid, consistent, recent and steady week after week play. Sorry I can't see any downside here. 100% agree, but how are the inactives playing better now than they were when they were on tour? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 15, 2016 6:01:04 GMT -5
I would be around 59th if it wasn't for the inactive players.
|
|
