|
Post by Drjones306 on Jun 28, 2020 2:33:10 GMT -5
Legend at Bmax Falls - approval is an illusion How does one define art? Obviously we get many courses that are objectively pretty, and many that are not. But how does one handle a masterstroke of performance art? Is it the destiny of such a moment in time, a true trailblazing original, to be just another database course, another object on the shelf? I say NO! Bmax falls needs to fly free, to throw off the shackles of convention (and database acceptance) and fly high, and free. Who are we to extinguish the flame? Godspeed, Bmax falls. Absolutely love the bunkering at Bmax Falls 😆
|
|
|
Post by b101 on Jun 28, 2020 8:59:15 GMT -5
Wynn Golf Club, Las Vegas - not approved
There are two versions, neither of which match the yardage you've submitted, so I have no clue which you meant.
|
|
|
Post by b101 on Jun 28, 2020 9:00:47 GMT -5
Riversbend Golf Club - not approved
At a par of 33 and yardage of 2399, this is far to short to be submitted to the database. Only 18 hole courses and yardage of 6400+ (roughly - any shorter than that would be impossible to use on Tour).
|
|
|
Post by b101 on Jun 28, 2020 9:02:00 GMT -5
Auqa Lakes Country Club - not approved
Not searchable (even correcting Auqa to Aqua) in game. Please check the information when submitting.
|
|
|
Post by mattyfromcanada on Jun 28, 2020 10:22:03 GMT -5
Legend at Bmax Falls - approval is an illusion How does one define art? Obviously we get many courses that are objectively pretty, and many that are not. But how does one handle a masterstroke of performance art? Is it the destiny of such a moment in time, a true trailblazing original, to be just another database course, another object on the shelf? I say NO! Bmax falls needs to fly free, to throw off the shackles of convention (and database acceptance) and fly high, and free. Who are we to extinguish the flame? Godspeed, Bmax falls. Soooooo.....just to be clear here, this will be on tour right? Literally hours of work went into this. Also no airplanes were used which I know is something people don't like, so I tried to avoid that. Was hoping for something a little more concrete and not so wishy washy. How do people even get to be reviewers anyways? Whatever.
|
|
|
Post by at143 on Jun 28, 2020 10:22:57 GMT -5
Wynn Golf Club, Las Vegas - not approved There are two versions, neither of which match the yardage you've submitted, so I have no clue which you meant. Hello B101, Yes, there are two versions published. In the submission you saw, I submitted "Wynn Golf Club, Las Vegas" which has a comma in the title. That is the one you should have searched and played. I also submitted "7366 yards " which is the correct total yardage shown from the furthest and most challenging tee on the course (Black in this case) Total yardage is measured from the furthest tee correct? If so, my submission should have been accurate. Thanks for the help, AT
|
|
|
Post by b101 on Jun 28, 2020 10:24:31 GMT -5
Legend at Bmax Falls - approval is an illusion How does one define art? Obviously we get many courses that are objectively pretty, and many that are not. But how does one handle a masterstroke of performance art? Is it the destiny of such a moment in time, a true trailblazing original, to be just another database course, another object on the shelf? I say NO! Bmax falls needs to fly free, to throw off the shackles of convention (and database acceptance) and fly high, and free. Who are we to extinguish the flame? Godspeed, Bmax falls. Soooooo.....just to be clear here, this will be on tour right? It's being rangered as a follow up to Shoreditch
|
|
|
Post by b101 on Jun 28, 2020 10:26:32 GMT -5
Wynn Golf Club, Las Vegas - not approved There are two versions, neither of which match the yardage you've submitted, so I have no clue which you meant. Hello B101, Yes, there are two versions published. In the submission you saw, I submitted "Wynn Golf Club, Las Vegas" which has a comma in the title. That is the one you should have searched and played. I also submitted "7366 yards " which is the correct total yardage shown from the furthest and most challenging tee on the course (Black in this case) Total yardage is measured from the furthest tee correct? If so, my submission should have been accurate. Thanks for the help, AT So, this one? Because that's 7,375... It's not a big issue, but want to be sure.
|
|
|
Post by at143 on Jun 28, 2020 10:54:58 GMT -5
Hello B101, Yes, there are two versions published. In the submission you saw, I submitted "Wynn Golf Club, Las Vegas" which has a comma in the title. That is the one you should have searched and played. I also submitted "7366 yards " which is the correct total yardage shown from the furthest and most challenging tee on the course (Black in this case) Total yardage is measured from the furthest tee correct? If so, my submission should have been accurate. Thanks for the help, AT So, this one? Because that's 7,375... It's not a big issue, but want to be sure. Ah, I see now what happened. I used the yardage shown in the editor. It still shows 7366 when I view the course in the "published courses" section. Which is strange..I wonder why? I suppose viewing the yardage this way can be inaccurate.
|
|
|
Post by b101 on Jun 30, 2020 8:46:47 GMT -5
Mauna Kea Resort & G.C. - not approved
Essentially exactly the same course as Pakalolo Reef which you submitted a week ago. Certainly an identical first hole. Only one submission per publish, please.
|
|
|
Post by b101 on Jun 30, 2020 9:12:30 GMT -5
Fields of October - not approved
Major sculpting and surfacing issues: a lot of sculpting work needed to remove the random hills, overcrowded with trees, unintentional blindness and bunkers need work.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 1, 2020 17:25:12 GMT -5
Mauna Kea Resort & G.C. - not approved Essentially exactly the same course as Pakalolo Reef which you submitted a week ago. Certainly an identical first hole. Only one submission per publish, please. Pakalolo Reef is a fictional course that is not as accurate as Mauna Kea(real course). Over half of the holes on Mauna Kea were redone from scratch for better accuracy. All of the bunkers were changed as well. Roadways, houses and other objects were added. Mauna Kea is a much better course and would look better in the TGC library than Pakalolo Reef. Is it possible to switch the courses (Add Mauna Kea and remove Pakalolo). It would be a shame for the community if Mauna Kea couldn't be added to the course database.
|
|
|
Post by mattf27 on Jul 1, 2020 19:44:29 GMT -5
Desert Oasis - not approved I'm not 100% sure that I've got the right course, as there's tons of courses with the same name, and none of them quite match up with the distance listed on the entry. Assuming I've got the right one, there's a few too many sculpting and surfacing issues around the course, with some awkward greens through the first couple holes.
|
|
|
Post by mattf27 on Jul 1, 2020 19:50:09 GMT -5
Mauna Kea Resort & G.C. - not approved Essentially exactly the same course as Pakalolo Reef which you submitted a week ago. Certainly an identical first hole. Only one submission per publish, please. Pakalolo Reef is a fictional course that is not as accurate as Mauna Kea(real course). Over half of the holes on Mauna Kea were redone from scratch for better accuracy. All of the bunkers were changed as well. Roadways, houses and other objects were added. Mauna Kea is a much better course and would look better in the TGC library than Pakalolo Reef. Is it possible to switch the courses (Add Mauna Kea and remove Pakalolo). It would be a shame for the community if Mauna Kea couldn't be added to the course database. While I'm sure you put some solid time into renovating your course, it's a lot to ask of reviewers to scour your course playing spot the differences and then determine if there was enough changes to warrant this being a "new" course. I'm assuming if Ben opened up your second file and was able to instantly recognize it as your other submission, it's probably too close to warrant it being considered two unique courses. The course being omitted from the database doesn't mean it's being deleted from the game. If you're worried about the community missing out on your course, make a thread in the completed courses section.
|
|
|
Post by simon on Jul 7, 2020 2:13:17 GMT -5
I submitted Bellmore National GC about one week ago. It got 4 likes but still ranked as “new” ... normally it doesn’t take longer than 2/3 days to to be approved / not approved ... any problems?
|
|