|
Post by welikeitroughnc on Jul 23, 2016 8:39:29 GMT -5
Pure evil that one ^^^^^
|
|
|
Post by jacobkessler on Jul 23, 2016 9:20:01 GMT -5
Thanks Pablo old pal now I'm sweating bullets and it's only 9:30 here ..... My pleasure, for sure Lol... Don't worry Mitch, I am out of town and haven't touched the game in a couple days, but from what I've seen through karma4u's pictures, it'll be an easy approve.
|
|
|
Post by welikeitroughnc on Jul 23, 2016 11:44:29 GMT -5
Pablo is killing me with the suspense.....
|
|
|
Post by jacobkessler on Jul 23, 2016 11:49:11 GMT -5
Pablo is killing me with the suspense..... Don't worry about it. If I was reviewing it, I would approve it for sure.
|
|
|
Post by pablo on Jul 23, 2016 14:47:59 GMT -5
Pablo is killing me with the suspense..... It's claimed by another reviewer, so I don't think it takes too long until you have a veredict (IMO, good veredict)
|
|
|
Post by tastegw on Jul 23, 2016 16:28:34 GMT -5
im reviewing it as we speak, my bottle of poo-pourri is almost out.
just kidding, im not a reviewer.
|
|
|
Post by hershalcrustofsk on Jul 26, 2016 11:57:30 GMT -5
Kilfinan Club - Not approved
Some fairways and rough looks auto-gen The sculpting needs to be seriously smoothed out, in plenty of fairways, bunkers and around the edges of fairways.
Those are the 2 main things, just too big of problems. Which is a shame because the lay-out is excellent, and uses firm greens very nicely, the course has a lot of potential and with some better landsculpting and a little more effort into fairway shaping it would be an easy approval.
|
|
|
Post by pablo on Jul 28, 2016 15:35:57 GMT -5
Diamond bar golf Club - Not Approved
The course itself is not bad, despite there are a few issues, mainly regarding the size of the greens, they are waaaaaay too small. I mean, waaaaaaaaaaaaay too small, and if you consider the slopes the feature, they are even smaller. Another issue with the course is the bunkering. They seem to have received zero sculpting. And lots of them are just default brushes thrown here and there, and in some cases, placed over fairway, first cut (very well done) and rough.
It's a nice effort, but still missing a bit of the detail needed to be inducted in the database
|
|
|
Post by pablo on Jul 28, 2016 15:40:12 GMT -5
Holden forest golf club - Not approved
Autogenerated course, not acceptable in our database
|
|
|
Post by hershalcrustofsk on Jul 30, 2016 16:24:31 GMT -5
Hogmerican - not accepted.
lots of auto-gen land needs a lot of sculpting/smoothing bunkers need to be sculpted trees and shrubs on fairways and even onto edges of greens
|
|
|
Post by hershalcrustofsk on Jul 30, 2016 17:25:03 GMT -5
Yellow Jack CC - not accepted
Serious sculpting issues in all areas, greens were ok but everything else needs some serious work.
|
|
|
Post by jack kersting on Aug 8, 2016 23:59:11 GMT -5
Navarre National Golf Club
|
|
|
Post by hershalcrustofsk on Aug 9, 2016 19:39:35 GMT -5
Cedar Valley Golf Club - Not approved
Auto-gen Very poor terrain work Auto-gen Very rough around the edges
|
|
|
Post by Moe Slorkman on Aug 25, 2016 10:05:31 GMT -5
All not accepted Smarsh Meadow Falcon Ridge (KFG Final Version) New Vhaldemar Fathom
I've scored a fair few hat-tricks in my time this is one I will forget very quickly. All 3 courses are 3 click design few tweeks here and there publish and submit. For a course to be accepted you need to start from scratch and put in a lot of hours.
I could go on but i'll put as much effort into my feedback as was put into these courses.
|
|
|
Post by pablo on Aug 27, 2016 10:42:00 GMT -5
GreenBush Sands G.C - Not Approved
This one is not a horrible course, but there are way too many autogenerated elements to let it go through
|
|