|
|
Post by mcbogga on Jan 1, 2016 4:07:03 GMT -5
Arrgh - don't know how much time my disconnect cost - but around two minutes is very possible...
Well - happy to compete.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mark (Kram) on Jan 1, 2016 13:41:30 GMT -5
DoubtfulObelisk still wins with that proposed method, he's hit some crazy scores. I don't think there should be an adjustment. I'm of the opinion that the Speed Golf format is equitable. I feel, I'm a reasonably quick player, but my connection (ethernet) or system or both would suggest not. I think if there was a way to level that playing field that would be fairer, if it was even possible.
|
|
|
|
Post by fuzion on Jan 1, 2016 13:50:15 GMT -5
DoubtfulObelisk still wins with that proposed method, he's hit some crazy scores. I don't think there should be an adjustment. I'm of the opinion that the Speed Golf format is equitable. I feel, I'm a reasonably quick player, but my connection (ethernet) or system or both would suggest not. I think if there was a way to level that playing field that would be fairer, if it was even possible. Internet connection makes no difference now that we take the time between your first shot and last shot. So all the downloading and stuff is done before the clock even starts. The warmup hole isn't even necessary, but I keep it in for old times sake and extra verification. And you both have an XB1, so there shouldn't be any difference there. Honestly, I think it's as fair as fair can be with regards to the timings. Going back to adding extra time per stroke, actually Keith would have won if I had upped it to 30s instead of 20s, but DoubtfulObelisk would have still taken the crown if I had only changed it 25s. It's something to think about, it means the slightly less speedy have a little more chance to win. |
|
