Q-School Revamp

[Deleted]

I'm constantly seeing new guys enter the tour and then showing discontent within the first couple of weeks when the flight they are in is not correct to their abilities. Should Q-School get a revamp?

My suggestion is to play 2 courses that have been used on each tour this year where we've got a ballpark figure to see what people should be shooting and go from there. The current courses on Q-school are too different from the ones that we're using on tours and it's causing false numbers, thus giving people false tour cards.

[eMLBCommish]

It already got re-vamped this month, per this thread:

tgctours.proboards.com/thread/2913/proposal-school-change-cut-lines

Prior, anyone shooting -1 got a PGA or Euro Card.

Give the new process time.

[gibson55]

the problem is people purposely shooting high to get on a lower tour for a chance to win.

[CTLegacy]

So would you want to win the special Olympics? or the real Olympics?

[eMLBCommish]

May 29, 2015 15:26:31 GMT -5 gibson55 said:

the problem is people purposely shooting high to get on a lower tour for a chance to win.

There's a term for people like this: Soft

There's a result for people like this: Delusions of Grandeur

[Deleted]

May 29, 2015 15:26:31 GMT -5 gibson55 said:

the problem is people purposely shooting high to get on a lower tour for a chance to win.

I think it's more to do with q-school catching some people off guard with the difficulty Gibson. There's changes coming very soon apparently but I think the cream is rising, albeit slowly, to the top at the minute. The web-b winner of last week started on champs a I think and he's playing on web-a next week.