boring maths coding boring

[jeffvadersith]

Hi there I like maths I am pretty ok at some stuff and dumb about other stuff.

I would like to ask a dumb question.

Binary code is the main type of code used by all computers? 

Is it possible to come up with a better code? 

never, no or yes?

or never 0 1

or 0 1 2+

the new number i came up with is called 
'infinity never'

it would look like infinity symbol.

FOR ANYONE WHO HEARD OF TERNARY or TRINARY my idea is different, as they only give 3 discrete options, 
whereas my idea has 2 options plus never...as it makes 'no' mean 'not now' which is different and better info than 'no'. 

if this were a 3d triangle it would get even more interesting.

I currently think i am an idiot or wrong so i am happy to own my own stupidity.

If all the above is already obvious to good maths people then I am an idiot, but at least I learned something new.

If its so wrong its not even wrong, i am happy to be an idiot at least I tried to figure it out, even if its nonsense.

if any of it is right or not known yet...i would imagine it could have a couple of teensy tiny benefits for one or two people. If it helped anyone I would make it open source.  

But I know it is dumb and wrong!

anyone understand one word of this? 

i can try to explain more but might be better somewhere else

benefits no negative numbers needed so 7 - 4 = 3      but  3 - 7 = 0 or never. 

real world application is you cant have less than zero apples, except no apples ever.     infinity never = my new number.

also i am dumb as hell

[coruler2]

Given that transistors are either on or off, EEPROM either has charge on the gate or not, the base for all computing will be binary. Bits are bits.

[Q]

what is even going on here? Where is the "I love math" option up there? You should probably look up Infinite Sets and Cardinality as that sounds like what you're trying to convey, I really don't follow though

[jeffvadersith]

Dec 10, 2020 23:05:20 GMT -5 coruler2 said:

Given that transistors are either on or off, EEPROM either has charge on the gate or not, the base for all computing will be binary. Bits are bits.

what you said tells me you are brilliant...thank you

my system can still include binary as well...but it is more

no neg numbers needed (lowest number is 00 never)
all computers would be more than twice as fast with my system.

please think about never in a logic gate option.

thank you if i am right you are a co owner of im wrong no loss!

[jeffvadersith]

Dec 11, 2020 6:18:05 GMT -5 Q said:

what is even going on here? Where is the "I love math" option up there? You should probably look up Infinite Sets and Cardinality as that sounds like what you're trying to convey, I really don't follow though

dude i can tell you are brilliant and i like your name

it is different to infinite sets (thrse do not ever imply or convey thr idea of 'never ever' or infinity never

practical use of infinity never...i am a crippled autistic man i will not win a golf major in 5 yrs.....infinity never ever
never will i win one in 5 yrs

sets and cardinality cannot convey this? 
excited to hear what u think.

you are part owner of open source thing if it were right! 

thanks for the help

i posted on physics forum they said binary is brilliant...i said 

so you believe its not possible to even improve on binary ever? lolz i am still gonna try otherwise we are stuck with  binary! 

[jeffvadersith]

ps if binary cant be improved on, why even bother trying to make quantum computers?
the answer is...
because it can still be done better.

by the way my idea is also a quantum computer

[jeffvadersith]

i only started studying this last week for funzies, i never tried before.

Got quite alot written down in a short space of time.
i am calling it 'the theory of nowt'

its still funny to me if i am wrong so i will keep trying

Q and coruler2 are part owners if i am right.

thank you for your help

i am probably so dumb!

[Q]

Just a volunteer Jeff, just suggesting some fun topics to read up on, cheers and have fun with your math adventure

[lions67]

I didn’t know that Sheldon Cooper liked The Golf Club! 🤣

[jeffvadersith]

cheers dude will look up stuff and come back and probably realise how much knowledge i lack.
Will leave it until i have something useful to add.

Just as one final question Q, do you, yourself, believe it is possible to have a better way of doing things than the current binary that is used by computers today?
i believe it is still possible that there is a better way than binary (could take many years to find a better way)

what do you think Q? never, no or yes

thanks for your help I will read up and get learning

[jeffvadersith]

just as an update I am discussing this with some quite clever people in a science forum...

so far I learned....

it is definitely possible to do better (one day) than binary. It is not YET invented.

my maths has neither been proven or disproven (yet)

I have written a code that is quicker than binary (in my opinion)

it is very tricky to write it on a phone, as it has new symbols in it that dont exist on computers!

not many people believe I should even be allowed to try to invent a new number...

infinity never...

but yet it now exists...
do i like lady gaga? yes? no? infinity never

anyway will be back when i can show my code.

thanks to all who have helped.

ps i know i am still 99.99999 likely to be wrong but i am excited to find out why

Q why? why should I do this? or why not?

thank you

[ErixonStone]

I am having a hard time understanding why "not now" and "infinity never" aren't just "no" represented along the axis of Time. It seems that what you have created is a two-dimensional array where one dimension is limited to a binary choice, and the other is not.

Why aren't there value of "yes now" and "yes always"? How would you describe oscillations like "no now, yes in 10 minutes, but no 20 minutes from now"?

We already have Base-3 math and what you're proposing seems a lot like binary math in two dimensions. That behaves a lot like Base-4 math.

Computers count in binary because, at its core, a switch can only have two states: ON and OFF. Any other expression of state includes the dimension of amplitude which has an infinite number of possibilities.

[jeffvadersith]

cheers dude

i invented a new number

i invented a new code that is not binary

i invented a new maths language

i have to try n write it on a computer but it is 3d image

i invented 2 new words wonderspritz and
preguess (true opposite of progress)

opposite of progress is not (only) stagnation it is preguess

progress is going forwards and seeing what happens (good bit limited to shots in the dark)

preguess is knowing an (achievable) end goal and working towards it, with what we know

i might need to build a computer with 3 circuits

i might need an option that ISNT BINARY

TO MAKE SOMETHING THAT IS BETTER THAN BINARY

it is already estsblished there could be better than binary

here is where i am, whatever you think i will keep cracking on

i started studying tbis 2 weeks ago.
.feom.high school maths education

how so you think i am doing?

i am debating this on a science forum elsewhwere and no one has yet disproven my numbers

or even knows how to.....

what is YOUR new theory that is better than binary?
i will probably keep going either way

please feel free to disprove my numbers..

[jeffvadersith]

please close thread I will come back to it if I ever invent a hoverboard...or speeder bike.
Elon hasnt cracked it yet so I guess it is pretty tricky.

Probably need to dot a few I's and cross a few T's first.

Thanks to all that contributed I learned loads because of you.

[Crazycanuck1985]

This thread is showing alot of preguess.