|
|
Post by zirus on Apr 22, 2020 19:21:27 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by coruler2 on Apr 22, 2020 21:01:09 GMT -5
Go play every course, then return with your difficulty suggestion and we can think about adding it. Oh, and continue it daily for every new course
|
|
|
|
Post by Oscar C on Apr 22, 2020 21:05:42 GMT -5
Difficulty based on what though zirus? Yours or mine? or the other 5000 members... not gonna happen mate. |
|
|
|
Post by sandsaver01 on Apr 23, 2020 6:34:07 GMT -5
Just to pile on, Zirus. If you are referring to the "difficulty" level that shows up on the game details page in game, that seems to me to be wildly inaccurate, especially when it comes to rating courses as easy or easiest. I have played a lot of easy/easiest courses that were really quite tough. |
|
|
|
Post by zirus on Apr 23, 2020 7:31:40 GMT -5
No need to jump on me lads i just meant, as sandsaver01 pointed to to add a column for the difficulty rating marked on the course details page.
Easy may be off but i wouldn't have thought the reverse to be true? A course marked as hard/very hard is unlikely to actually be very easy..... could still be useful?
|
|
|
|
Post by ErixonStone on Apr 23, 2020 8:23:49 GMT -5
The course difficulty rating in-game is more a function of who has played the course, rather than win the course's own difficulty. The reason for this is that the difficulty rating is based on gross score without any consideration for the players who've posted those scores.
Chris Rawesy shoots 58 on your course? Boom: Easiest. Bunch of noobs shoot 90? Boom: Difficult.
Because the courses we share on TGCTours are played mostly by players who play several rounds per week, they tend to all be marked "Easiest".
|
|
|
|
Post by ezzinomilonga on May 17, 2020 18:29:59 GMT -5
It would be maybe more useful and interesting to add the Course Rating (the Slope Rating is completely broken, so is totally useless), but as Patrick explained about the difficulty level, even this number depends by the level of the first 300 players who completes a course, so is always a number not totally trustable. It would be anyway useful, in some measure, but the problem here is that it would require an enormous work. And i mean ENORMOUS, because is a work that shouldn't be made just one time, but the whole list should be checked and updated at least every couple of days looking for any course that reach 300 plays, we are talking about a crazy amount of work, here  And i know it cause months ago i started a list with also this statistic among many others, that still exists as a google doc, but after i listed more or less 1500 courses, if i remember well, i simply realized it was an insane amount of endless work for just one guy, so i renounced.  |
|
