|
|
Post by Knock25Out on Feb 23, 2015 1:31:58 GMT -5
Just a thought, maybe we could institute a minimum of tour events to qualify for the playoffs (say 5 or 7). Because if the top guys come over from the pga for a week and win a tournament they are going to have nearly enough money to make it by the end. Im all for crossovers, but also want to reward the guys who grind week in week out on their respective tour who may not get a spot because there are 10 players with 2 events and a win and a top 5 with more money in only 2 events. I realize I am exaggerating and was just an idea I had, obviously its not perfect.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2015 6:42:29 GMT -5
Seriously folks, this is a good thing. It allows a lot more flexibility for players to play courses that cater to their strengths and likes. There is no minimum number of times you have to play over on the EURO side to qualify. If you win just ONE tournament on the PGA, you are invited to the PGA Championship and most likely many of the other majors. The FedEx tournament is based on points, if you have gained enough points in a few plays, you have still earned your way there. That is the beauty of the point system, win, play well you are in quicker than if you don't. In real life there not such thing as crossovers. A PGA tour card holder needs a sponsor invite to play most Euro tournament so you would not have the chance to qualify by that means. Originally before this tour started, I thought only the top 10 (insert whatever number) on their respective money list should be allowed to crossover. |
|
|
|
Post by AFCTUJacko on Feb 24, 2015 14:28:33 GMT -5
or, the top 50 in the WGR can play wherever they like (as they can in real life pretty much) , and those outside have to play on the tour for which they hold a card.
As someone above stated, your average Joe Euro/PGA tour player can't just decide to go and play on a tour they aren't a member of
|
|
