Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 26, 2015 3:41:25 GMT -5
Hi.
Could we make it increasing numbers in stead, so it easier to see how many players there are in a tournament, just by looking at the leaderboard?
As it is now, everyone that has not submitted a score are showing up in 10th spot, and thats no point?
NB, sorry about the english, didnt have the vocabulary to express myself properly on this one...
|
|
|
|
Post by jtrippuk on Jan 26, 2015 6:26:21 GMT -5
So what u saying is if you haven't put a score in it you should be at the bottom
Great idea, wonder if this is possible
|
|
|
|
Post by Tim on Jan 26, 2015 6:35:21 GMT -5
The leaderboards are done this way on purpose. Same as the real tour does it. The guys that have not teed off that are still at "E" are sandwiched in between the guys that are + and -. We looked at this early on and that's how they do it so we followed suit.
Thanks!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 26, 2015 7:57:41 GMT -5
Ok Tim. I understand that. Maybe you could just add the total number of players on the same page as the Leaderboard then? The reason I asked the original question is that its hard to tell how many people are left out there, when they all have the same leaderboard-position... And when your waiting to see if you make the cut, you have to count instead of just look at the numbers. (I know ist like this on the real tour, and I dont agree with them either....  ) |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 26, 2015 12:07:05 GMT -5
Hey Tim, along the same lines but is it worth adding a green up arrow and red down arrow next to each persons name so we can see how well they did and if they were moving up or down the leaderboard after rounds 2,3 and 4? Probably be a pain in the rear end to do though with scores for rounds 1 and 2 being entered throughout the week.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brionne on Jan 26, 2015 15:45:31 GMT -5
Hey Tim, along the same lines but is it worth adding a green up arrow and red down arrow next to each persons name so we can see how well they did and if they were moving up or down the leaderboard after rounds 2,3 and 4? Probably be a pain in the rear end to do though with scores for rounds 1 and 2 being entered throughout the week. This is a nice idea.. Perhaps it could be automated? Would really help finding good reporting stories to.. |
|
|
|
Post by cromster on Jan 27, 2015 4:07:21 GMT -5
Hi Tim,
That's great you are following the real tours etc, but for the final results published can we not have the people who have not completed 4 rounds removed or something? It really skews the results.
Great idea about the up and down arrows
Thanks Paul
|
|
|
|
Post by Tim on Jan 27, 2015 6:38:49 GMT -5
All great ideas fellas! I love them -- I'll see what I can do :-)
|
|
|
|
Post by Pubknight on Jan 27, 2015 14:00:15 GMT -5
As someone holding their breath for a cut line reveal, would it be at all possible beside the cut line count # at the top of a leaderboard, to get a 'projected cut' score? Kinda like they do on TV?
At least while waiting for the official cut, it could be something to watch as scores come in.
Was thinking you could use the already posted scores, and based on the averages of those 'extrapolate' scores for people that had not yet posted.
It wouldn't be overly scientific, or necessarily even accurate, but for those of us holding their breath, it could be fun/maddening to watch as it changes over the week.
|
|
)
