|
Post by b101 on Nov 7, 2020 1:14:50 GMT -5
It’s nothing to do with architecture. Haven’t played the latest and it wasn’t my review, but it’s been literally seven days since your last thread about why a different course wasn’t Tour Worthy. Given that you focus so much on the environment, planting etc. I’d be willing to bet your attention to detail with the playable areas isn’t there.
Put it this way, I’d be hard pushed to make something I’m happy with as Tour Worthy in 7 days. Tour Worthy is the best of the best, the ones we are saying to schedulers and rangers are absolute must looks for a tour slot. In seven days, having had some major issues with bunkers on the last course, I’m honestly not surprised that this one is Approved as well.
|
|
|
Post by 15eicheltower9 on Nov 7, 2020 8:25:16 GMT -5
Op was deleted but judging by the creator of this thread, I'm guessing the question was something like, "why is Vanyard only approved and not tour worthy". I reviewed it and here are a few things:
I loved the course. It fits my appetite for courses that are different. The course was fun and playable but not great. It would fit good in a smaller casual society and I'd recommend it to anyone to give it a play. You created a really cool environment and it's obvious you know your way around the designer (Ben's right about the bunkers though, they are average). I even bumped your thread after reviewing and have played it again since. But as much as I liked it, there were no "wow" moments outside of the environment. Not enough for me to suggest a few hundred people (or even thousand) play it 4 times over the course of a week.
Also had some stuttering around the rocks and waterfalls so probably wouldn't make it past the rangers anyway.
|
|