|
Post by bobbyallen on Oct 11, 2020 17:34:37 GMT -5
Thanks, So for this week, you said earlier in the week unlimited pro cards based on comparison to specific qualifying target in CC a. What are the projected estimates this week for the 3 pro tours? When do emails go out? Thanks again, Robert
|
|
|
Post by Cecil Harvey on Oct 12, 2020 0:17:04 GMT -5
Week 3 Qualifying Pool results from my quick looksie: Platinum = 1 card; -50 Elite = 2 cards; -44 and -42 Kinetic = 4 cards; -39, -37, -36, and -35 CC-A = 27 cards; -33 to -20 CC-B = 35 cards; -20 to -12 CC-C = 33 cards; -12 to - 7 CC-D = 30 cards; - 7 to - 4 CC-E = 38 cards; - 4 to E CC-F = 35 cards; E to + 4 CC-G = 41 cards; + 4 to + 8 CC-H = 37 cards; + 8 to +12 CC-I = 32 cards; +13 to +16 CC-J = 41 cards; +16 to +21 CC-K = 40 cards; +21 to +26 CC-L = 49 cards; +26 to +35
(tiebreakers occurred where the same score appears on two different tiers)
Congrats to all with a shiny new tour card! Good luck out on the links!
|
|
|
Post by Cecil Harvey on Oct 12, 2020 0:29:24 GMT -5
Thanks, So for this week, you said earlier in the week unlimited pro cards based on comparison to specific qualifying target in CC a. What are the projected estimates this week for the 3 pro tours? When do emails go out? Thanks again, Robert It looks like it was one shot better than the CC-A winner was a baseline for week 3 results. -32 won CC-A last week and the CC-A cards started at -33. That means, IMO, that Pro tours started at -34 (possibility they started at -35 too as there was no actual -34 score).
Kinetic range was -35 to -39 with 4 cards given.
Elite range was -42 to -44 with just 2 cards given. Platinum range wasn't a range as one person got a card at -50.
So range was 5 or 6 strokes once you found the CC-A top end.
|
|
|
Post by Doyley on Oct 12, 2020 0:37:23 GMT -5
Thanks, So for this week, you said earlier in the week unlimited pro cards based on comparison to specific qualifying target in CC a. What are the projected estimates this week for the 3 pro tours? When do emails go out? Thanks again, Robert It looks like it was one shot better than the CC-A winner was a baseline for week 3 results. -32 won CC-A last week and the CC-A cards started at -33. That means, IMO, that Pro tours started at -34 (possibility they started at -35 too as there was no actual -34 score).
Kinetic range was -35 to -39 with 4 cards given.
Elite range was -42 to -44 with just 2 cards given. Platinum range wasn't a range as one person got a card at -50.
So range was 5 or 6 strokes once you found the CC-A top end.
there is no restrictions on how many pro tour cards can be earned - just need to shoot good enough - and it's all based off a CC-A score so it's not easy to say until the end of the week.
|
|
|
Post by Cecil Harvey on Oct 12, 2020 0:46:40 GMT -5
It looks like it was one shot better than the CC-A winner was a baseline for week 3 results. -32 won CC-A last week and the CC-A cards started at -33. That means, IMO, that Pro tours started at -34 (possibility they started at -35 too as there was no actual -34 score).
Kinetic range was -35 to -39 with 4 cards given.
Elite range was -42 to -44 with just 2 cards given. Platinum range wasn't a range as one person got a card at -50.
So range was 5 or 6 strokes once you found the CC-A top end.
there is no restrictions on how many pro tour cards can be earned - just need to shoot good enough - and it's all based off a CC-A score so it's not easy to say until the end of the week. Understood. But that is good information for others that need to know.
I was just trying to suss out the stroke range from that CC-A base score looking upwards to the Pro Tours and their range in weekly qualifying. (How many strokes above the CCA base score was Kinetic and Elite)
I didn't envision that CC-A base score being so high. I thought you might go with the lowest 1 promotion mark score or maximum the lowest 2 promotion mark score for that base score. I realize that would have qualifiers finishing on Kinetic while some players that played the actual tour finishing up still with a CC-A card, but given that they earned promo marks that would lead one to believe that their future arc would get them promoted at some point.
But this is just me yapping and being pedantic for the sake of being pedantic. You and the rest of the team have a pretty solid setup for the season, IMO.
|
|
|
Post by tastyhotschmoes on Oct 12, 2020 12:38:06 GMT -5
I am really not sure what I am doing here. I am signed up to Qualify, but where do I go to see the schedule?
"Qualifying Schedule" page? If so, It appears I am waiting until the Cracked Open 10/19 to 10/24?
|
|
|
Post by Blade on Oct 12, 2020 13:50:38 GMT -5
I am really not sure what I am doing here. I am signed up to Qualify, but where do I go to see the schedule? "Qualifying Schedule" page? If so, It appears I am waiting until the Cracked Open 10/19 to 10/24? I could be wrong, but I think you can play the Challenge Circuit Society right now. Your name would then appear at this link ( www.tgctours.com/Tournament/LeaderBoard/5780 ) and you would be in the running. If not, then this link ( www.tgctours.com/Tour/Tournaments?tourId=15&season=2021 ) shows you the Qualifying Schedule (with links to the field, etc). Good luck!
|
|
|
Post by Doyley on Oct 12, 2020 14:27:46 GMT -5
I didn't envision that CC-A base score being so high. I thought you might go with the lowest 1 promotion mark score or maximum the lowest 2 promotion mark score for that base score. I realize that would have qualifiers finishing on Kinetic while some players that played the actual tour finishing up still with a CC-A card, but given that they earned promo marks that would lead one to believe that their future arc would get them promoted at some point.
It'll be lower for this week - was a miscommunication between Tim and I. Last week was based off the winning score - usually based off 20th place on CC-A.
|
|
|
Post by elfmaster1957 on Oct 14, 2020 8:16:27 GMT -5
I'm going to give this a shot. Putting is my main issue right now.
|
|
|
Post by Cecil Harvey on Oct 17, 2020 23:46:19 GMT -5
Week 4 projections for the Qualifying Pool here
|
|
|
Post by bobbyallen on Oct 18, 2020 19:29:34 GMT -5
Doley, I'm confused. The week before i 0layed and shot -35, got put on Kinect, got the email on the 12th. I did not play this week that just ended, i misread the UTC timezone info i looked up and was too late for my first 2 rounds. So, i did not play. Today, i got an email c9ngrats you are on the cca, like i played the q school that just ended, which i did not. I did not see anything about an auto demotion for not playing one week. Is this a mistake, can it be corrected? Thanks so much for the help as always. Know it's a lot of work what you folks do. Robert Allen RamsnDodgersfan tag Ps4
|
|
|
Post by Koop on Oct 18, 2020 19:41:30 GMT -5
Observation, I believe that anyone who tries to or wants to qualify should have to play the 2 original course that were played when the season began. The CC courses are NOT even close to the difficulty that the originals were. Not to mention that it was 8 rounds total, not 4.
If you want a level, fair playing field, judge them using the same criteria and play the same courses. Use the special events to host it and when there is promo events or any other site wide event, obviously there is no qualifying that week.
Just thinking out loud here, and maybe I shouldn't :-)
Carry on
|
|
|
Post by Cecil Harvey on Oct 18, 2020 20:22:30 GMT -5
Doley, I'm confused. The week before i 0layed and shot -35, got put on Kinect, got the email on the 12th. I did not play this week that just ended, i misread the UTC timezone info i looked up and was too late for my first 2 rounds. So, i did not play. Today, i got an email c9ngrats you are on the cca, like i played the q school that just ended, which i did not. I did not see anything about an auto demotion for not playing one week. Is this a mistake, can it be corrected? Thanks so much for the help as always. Know it's a lot of work what you folks do. Robert Allen RamsnDodgersfan tag Ps4 Just tagging Doyley like I think you meant to do.
Also would be better if you sent this as an email to commish@tgctours.com as that will create a ticket. They will check emails, but it isn't guaranteed that Admin will see random forum threads.
Hope you get things resolved.
|
|
|
Post by Doyley on Oct 18, 2020 20:37:56 GMT -5
Doley, I'm confused. The week before i 0layed and shot -35, got put on Kinect, got the email on the 12th. I did not play this week that just ended, i misread the UTC timezone info i looked up and was too late for my first 2 rounds. So, i did not play. Today, i got an email c9ngrats you are on the cca, like i played the q school that just ended, which i did not. I did not see anything about an auto demotion for not playing one week. Is this a mistake, can it be corrected? Thanks so much for the help as always. Know it's a lot of work what you folks do. Robert Allen RamsnDodgersfan tag Ps4 You can ignore the email - you still have a Kinetic tour card. We had some issues this morning - if it happens again next week it might be a lingering issue we need to address but we think we fixed.
|
|
DP
Weekend Golfer
Posts: 149
Tour: Kinetic
|
Post by DP on Oct 18, 2020 20:40:16 GMT -5
Observation, I believe that anyone who tries to or wants to qualify should have to play the 2 original course that were played when the season began. The CC courses are NOT even close to the difficulty that the originals were. Not to mention that it was 8 rounds total, not 4. If you want a level, fair playing field, judge them using the same criteria and play the same courses. Use the special events to host it and when there is promo events or any other site wide event, obviously there is no qualifying that week. Just thinking out loud here, and maybe I shouldn't :-) Carry on I'm a newbie to the tours and I'm really really enjoying competing on them, but I'd be lying if I said it didn't sting when I see people qualifying and getting placed in much higher flights, while shooting worse scores than me on the same courses. I shot terribly on Evangelist because Evangelist is really hard but I also played like crap too so I do blame myself for that. I've gotten better since Q school of course but that course was a beast, especially on the settings that were used. So I co-sign your post, I can't imagine people that are going low on these CC tracks would be doing the same on Whiskey and Evangelist. But if it causes more difficulty or strain on the admins then I also completely support not doing it this way too. Just some feedback from a very average player.
|
|