Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 7, 2019 18:52:08 GMT -5
Holy. Freakin'. Crap.
|
|
|
Post by yaters on Sept 7, 2019 20:08:27 GMT -5
Good competition everyone. This was really top notch. My favorite tour here on TGCT for sure.
And big thanks again to all you guys that put this together.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 7, 2019 22:53:39 GMT -5
A huge thanks to mayday_golf83 for doing a tremendous amount of work behind the scenes on this, and to Captains Montgomery and Georgiades for motivating your teams all week long. To the victor go the spoils (but definitely not to THIS Victor).
|
|
|
Post by tottenhamordie on Sept 7, 2019 23:04:21 GMT -5
Well played by everyone, and congrats to team Katana on the win.
With that being said, there are a few things that rubbed me the wrong way. 1. i was apparently the only person who didnt know the singles rounds were match play. there is no indication of it anywhere on both threads. if i had known that, i may have played differently than just thinking strokes were the target. 2. they had an excused absence for the singles round, but when one of our teammates had an emergency come up, their captain was given the choice of whos score would count twice? and he picks the dude who shoots -2 LOL? why werent we allowed to pick a players score to count twice on their team? 3. the replacements, no one on the team had a chance to accept or decline, or even discuss the replacements in this. all of it was done behind the scenes between 3 people, and just announced to us in threads.
i enjoyed the competition, i just didnt enjoy losing like that. made up rules and "fair play" decisions made by the seat of the pants. the biggest issue for me is #2 on my list, giving a team(in my opinion) free choice over the outcome of 2 matches just doesnt seem fair to me. especially when they had a player excused from singles play, but we couldnt have one excused for an emergency? and the whole "this is the first time we have done anything like this" just doesnt seem like the right response here, because this decision seems like a common sense thing to me, so being "new" to setting up and running a tourney doesnt apply here. i also dont care for the "the captains agreed to it", because there were 18 other people in this event, and no one elses opinion or thoughts seemed to matter.
again, congrats to Team Katana, just wish this wouldve worked out differently than it did. but nothing like a sour taste in your mouth the day before a new season starts.
|
|
mayday_golf83
TGCT Design Competition Directors
Posts: 2,279
TGCT Name: Jeremy Mayo
Tour: Elite
|
Post by mayday_golf83 on Sept 7, 2019 23:18:18 GMT -5
Well that wraps it up ...
MATCH 19: SHAUN TRAYYS def. Mark Hale, 5 & 4 MATCH 22: Justin Ciboch vs. Jacob Kessler, Halved MATCH 26: SHAUN TRAYYS def. Victor Lane, 5 & 3
Team Georgiades, with a spirited comeback in singles wins the BCT Cup 14.5-13.5 ... Congrats to both teams and all who participated. I'll have more thoughts later.
|
|
mayday_golf83
TGCT Design Competition Directors
Posts: 2,279
TGCT Name: Jeremy Mayo
Tour: Elite
|
Post by mayday_golf83 on Sept 7, 2019 23:58:50 GMT -5
Well played by everyone, and congrats to team Katana on the win.
With that being said, there are a few things that rubbed me the wrong way. 1. i was apparently the only person who didnt know the singles rounds were match play. there is no indication of it anywhere on both threads. if i had known that, i may have played differently than just thinking strokes were the target. 2. they had an excused absence for the singles round, but when one of our teammates had an emergency come up, their captain was given the choice of whos score would count twice? and he picks the dude who shoots -2 LOL? why werent we allowed to pick a players score to count twice on their team? 3. the replacements, no one on the team had a chance to accept or decline, or even discuss the replacements in this. all of it was done behind the scenes between 3 people, and just announced to us in threads.
i enjoyed the competition, i just didnt enjoy losing like that. made up rules and "fair play" decisions made by the seat of the pants. the biggest issue for me is #2 on my list, giving a team(in my opinion) free choice over the outcome of 2 matches just doesnt seem fair to me. especially when they had a player excused from singles play, but we couldnt have one excused for an emergency? and the whole "this is the first time we have done anything like this" just doesnt seem like the right response here, because this decision seems like a common sense thing to me, so being "new" to setting up and running a tourney doesnt apply here. i also dont care for the "the captains agreed to it", because there were 18 other people in this event, and no one elses opinion or thoughts seemed to matter.
again, congrats to Team Katana, just wish this wouldve worked out differently than it did. but nothing like a sour taste in your mouth the day before a new season starts.
Well Tott, since you're calling me out in the thread. let's discuss facts. 1. I'll own the first one. Since it was made clear from the start that this was a Ryder Cup-style format, I assumed everyone knew it was match play. I think the way the scoreboards were set up that was clear, but I would have been more than happy to answer this question had it been asked. 2. I'm not going to get into many specifics of the Match 19 sub, but I will say that it was very nearly a forfeit win for Team Katana, and actually it was Mike who convinced us to let someone fill in that spot. The way Darryl and I took the absence was not an emergency, rather a lack of communication that the player in question was not going to be available for singles, and the timing gave us a very small window to come up with a contingency plan. As for the agreement for Mike to pick the replacement -- and the player who would take that spot -- we're made in our discussions BEFORE the player played his round, no there was no unfair advantage gained there. 3. We had two guys ghost on us last minute ... and it wasn't like there was a long waiting list of players looking to get in that met the requirements of having played on BCT at some point in the last season. I'm grateful that Justin and Shaun were able to help us out on such short notice. The reason the decisions were left to the captains and myself was because we all had the best interest of the event in mind -- not what was going to help the particular team we were on. In fact, I will say both captains made decisions for the betterment of the event that we're perhaps not in their team's best interest. I don't think Darryl and Mike should be criticized for that, rather commended. We all were in agreement that the matches should be decided on the course, not by who was unable to play. Ultimately it was decided on the course. Team Montgomery had plenty of chances to wrap up the cup sooner, and we frankly didn't get it done. I can look myself in the mirror on that one. Even though I went 3-1-1, I point to faulty play coming in on the my second nine in Rounds 2 and 4 that probably cost us a point. That's the match right there. I find it to be unfortunate that these grievances are coming out after the fact, when they easily could have been addressed with myself, Darryl or Mike at any point during the event. We all would have been happy to explain the rationale behind our decisions at any time ... rationale that has been outlined above. This was aimed to be a fun, relaxed , FRIENDLY, event to celebrate year one of the BCT and the players who made it successful. Yes, there was a winning side and a losing side, but this event was always going to be more about camaraderie than competition. The decisions made were in that spirit, and I stand behind them 100 percent. Are there thing that can be improved on for next year? Absolutely. If you care to have a constructive conversation in those regards, I'm all ears. I may or may not run the event next year (I'll start season 6 on BCT, but may decide to go back to Q-School at some point), but I hope it carries on and, if I'm not on the BCT, would gladly help whoever wants to take it on. It was no small undertaking but, with the help of the captains, Doyley and Adam Grove (who, by the way gave us an AWESOME course to play on), this event would have never gotten off the ground. I, for one, do not have a bitter taste in my mouth, quite the opposite. I had a blast this week and thought the camaraderie in the team chat was good and the vast majority of this thread has been positive, despite some circumstances that were beyond our control. Don't get me wrong, I would have loved to have been on the winning side, but take my cap off to Team Georgiades for a brilliantly played singles round. They came through when it mattered and are worthy champions. Well played. Now onward to season 6. Those who have moved on, good luck to you in your new tours and for the rest of you, I'll see you on the BCT circuit this week.
|
|
|
Post by katana22 on Sept 8, 2019 0:09:07 GMT -5
Well played by everyone, and congrats to team Katana on the win.
With that being said, there are a few things that rubbed me the wrong way. 1. i was apparently the only person who didnt know the singles rounds were match play. there is no indication of it anywhere on both threads. if i had known that, i may have played differently than just thinking strokes were the target. 2. they had an excused absence for the singles round, but when one of our teammates had an emergency come up, their captain was given the choice of whos score would count twice? and he picks the dude who shoots -2 LOL? why werent we allowed to pick a players score to count twice on their team? 3. the replacements, no one on the team had a chance to accept or decline, or even discuss the replacements in this. all of it was done behind the scenes between 3 people, and just announced to us in threads.
i enjoyed the competition, i just didnt enjoy losing like that. made up rules and "fair play" decisions made by the seat of the pants. the biggest issue for me is #2 on my list, giving a team(in my opinion) free choice over the outcome of 2 matches just doesnt seem fair to me. especially when they had a player excused from singles play, but we couldnt have one excused for an emergency? and the whole "this is the first time we have done anything like this" just doesnt seem like the right response here, because this decision seems like a common sense thing to me, so being "new" to setting up and running a tourney doesnt apply here. i also dont care for the "the captains agreed to it", because there were 18 other people in this event, and no one elses opinion or thoughts seemed to matter.
again, congrats to Team Katana, just wish this wouldve worked out differently than it did. but nothing like a sour taste in your mouth the day before a new season starts.
Let me address what happened in singles as far as the the replacement went, 1st off let me make it clear that it was talked about before Mark Hale shot his round and in no way did I or anyone else know the score at the time. as to the reason I picked a player score for the other team. Curtis wanted to take a DQ for the match but I didn't think that was fair, so after we talked about it Curtis said ok you pick a guy out of these 5 guys who are the only guys eligible to have there score count twice, they were Reed, Lane, Hale, Hamm and Ciboch and I picked Hale thinking that, that was a fair replacement. It was really as simple as that in the end.
|
|
|
Post by tottenhamordie on Sept 8, 2019 0:38:51 GMT -5
i wasnt calling anyone out, i was simply stating my thoughts on it. when everything is discussed behind closed doors, the decisions that are made seem like they are knee jerk ones, since no one knows what is happening until the moment its told to everyone. as far as the "forfeit" for Shanes emergency, how does that make any sense? an emergency comes up, he lets everyone know, and the solution is "hey to make it fair you get to pick whos round counts as 2 or we forfeit"? i still dont see how, with fairness taken into account, we couldnt have an excuse absence for our emergency. one would even think an unexpected emergency would warrant an excused sub, since it is after all, an emergency. in all, it all adds up to just feel a little shallow. their replacement for a player who was drafted and disappeared, who showed no interest on the forum, of playing in this. it comes down to him winning it all.
obviously all of this is coming from what you will call a "sore loser" or "salty", but i had already brought up some of this before round 5, in twitch chats. again, everything being done behind the scenes and just told to us makes it look a different way. it seems like this went from a drafted team, to hand picked replacements in the course of 3 or 4 days. i wouldve rather just cut it to 9 man teams and be done with it. the people who signed up, shouldve been the only people playing. and the captains, or any other player, shouldnt get the power to dictate another teams line up or results. thats all i am going to say on this.
thanks for all the work behind the scenes and by all the players whos showed interest and go this off the ground from the start. without the initial 20 registrants this would have never happened, and for you, i am thankful.
P.S. this was fun, but at the same time i am not buddy buddy, or on first name basis with anyone. i feel like a lot of the fun was just between long time friends on here. also the whole "this was for fun and to celebrate" kind of goes out the window when people were obviously out to win this. so much so that we were threatened with a forfeit for an emergency. and while it was fun, winning was obviously the goal here. why else would dudes who played a few events, or never even played, sign up for a CUP event?
|
|
|
Post by TheDominator273 on Sept 8, 2019 0:40:38 GMT -5
Well played by everyone, and congrats to team Katana on the win.
With that being said, there are a few things that rubbed me the wrong way. 1. i was apparently the only person who didnt know the singles rounds were match play. there is no indication of it anywhere on both threads. if i had known that, i may have played differently than just thinking strokes were the target. 2. they had an excused absence for the singles round, but when one of our teammates had an emergency come up, their captain was given the choice of whos score would count twice? and he picks the dude who shoots -2 LOL? why werent we allowed to pick a players score to count twice on their team? 3. the replacements, no one on the team had a chance to accept or decline, or even discuss the replacements in this. all of it was done behind the scenes between 3 people, and just announced to us in threads.
i enjoyed the competition, i just didnt enjoy losing like that. made up rules and "fair play" decisions made by the seat of the pants. the biggest issue for me is #2 on my list, giving a team(in my opinion) free choice over the outcome of 2 matches just doesnt seem fair to me. especially when they had a player excused from singles play, but we couldnt have one excused for an emergency? and the whole "this is the first time we have done anything like this" just doesnt seem like the right response here, because this decision seems like a common sense thing to me, so being "new" to setting up and running a tourney doesnt apply here. i also dont care for the "the captains agreed to it", because there were 18 other people in this event, and no one elses opinion or thoughts seemed to matter.
again, congrats to Team Katana, just wish this wouldve worked out differently than it did. but nothing like a sour taste in your mouth the day before a new season starts.
Let me address what happened in singles as far as the the replacement went, 1st off let me make it clear that it was talked about before Mark Hale shot his round and in no way did I or anyone else know the score at the time. as to the reason I picked a player score for the other team. Curtis wanted to take a DQ for the match but I didn't think that was fair, so after we talked about it Curtis said ok you pick a guy out of these 4 guys who are the only guys eligible to have there score count twice, they were Reed, Lane, Hale, Hamm and Ciboch and I picked Hale thinking that, that was a fair replacement. It was really as simple as that in the end. So the match in question is Trayys vs Hale yes? Trayys and Lane were already playing a match so throw that name out leaving a choice beforehand of Reed, Hale, Hamm and Ciboch. Against Hale as we know the result already, a 5&4 win for Trayys. Had Reed been chosen the result would have ended up being a 1 up victory by Reed with a birdie on 18. If Hamm had been chosen the result would have been a 2 up victory for Hamm with birdies on 17 and 18. If Ciboch had been chosen the result would have been a 3&2 victory for Trayys. In the first 4 rounds the players available to be chosen shot: Hale: -30 Reed: -44 Hamm: -41 Ciboch: -28 Lane: -50 What this tells you is that it was a complete toss up for Mike to choose a player to represent you especially then the match was nearly forfeited. Had the Lane/Trayys match got doubled down surely you would have felt better going into it after Lane shot -50 through team play, 4 shots better than Trayys' -46 yet that match ended with the worst result for your team. This was a fun team event that had a lot of work go on behind the scenes to make happen, especially with some of the curveballs thrown mid event and your b%&ing is rude to those that put this on and frankly you come off as a whiny sore loser with your post.
|
|
|
Post by tottenhamordie on Sept 8, 2019 0:48:52 GMT -5
Well played by everyone, and congrats to team Katana on the win.
With that being said, there are a few things that rubbed me the wrong way. 1. i was apparently the only person who didnt know the singles rounds were match play. there is no indication of it anywhere on both threads. if i had known that, i may have played differently than just thinking strokes were the target. 2. they had an excused absence for the singles round, but when one of our teammates had an emergency come up, their captain was given the choice of whos score would count twice? and he picks the dude who shoots -2 LOL? why werent we allowed to pick a players score to count twice on their team? 3. the replacements, no one on the team had a chance to accept or decline, or even discuss the replacements in this. all of it was done behind the scenes between 3 people, and just announced to us in threads.
i enjoyed the competition, i just didnt enjoy losing like that. made up rules and "fair play" decisions made by the seat of the pants. the biggest issue for me is #2 on my list, giving a team(in my opinion) free choice over the outcome of 2 matches just doesnt seem fair to me. especially when they had a player excused from singles play, but we couldnt have one excused for an emergency? and the whole "this is the first time we have done anything like this" just doesnt seem like the right response here, because this decision seems like a common sense thing to me, so being "new" to setting up and running a tourney doesnt apply here. i also dont care for the "the captains agreed to it", because there were 18 other people in this event, and no one elses opinion or thoughts seemed to matter.
again, congrats to Team Katana, just wish this wouldve worked out differently than it did. but nothing like a sour taste in your mouth the day before a new season starts.
Let me address what happened in singles as far as the the replacement went, 1st off let me make it clear that it was talked about before Mark Hale shot his round and in no way did I or anyone else know the score at the time. as to the reason I picked a player score for the other team. Curtis wanted to take a DQ for the match but I didn't think that was fair, so after we talked about it Curtis said ok you pick a guy out of these 4 guys who are the only guys eligible to have there score count twice, they were Reed, Lane, Hale, Hamm and Ciboch and I picked Hale thinking that, that was a fair replacement. It was really as simple as that in the end.
well that just goes back to one of my original issues. no one knows any of the details, we just know the outcome. i hope you can see how that creates speculation. the mark replacement was just a coincidence, and i get that now. bot some of the other things still seem out of place
|
|
|
Post by tottenhamordie on Sept 8, 2019 1:04:44 GMT -5
Let me address what happened in singles as far as the the replacement went, 1st off let me make it clear that it was talked about before Mark Hale shot his round and in no way did I or anyone else know the score at the time. as to the reason I picked a player score for the other team. Curtis wanted to take a DQ for the match but I didn't think that was fair, so after we talked about it Curtis said ok you pick a guy out of these 4 guys who are the only guys eligible to have there score count twice, they were Reed, Lane, Hale, Hamm and Ciboch and I picked Hale thinking that, that was a fair replacement. It was really as simple as that in the end. So the match in question is Trayys vs Hale yes? Trayys and Lane were already playing a match so throw that name out leaving a choice beforehand of Reed, Hale, Hamm and Ciboch. Against Hale as we know the result already, a 5&4 win for Trayys. Had Reed been chosen the result would have ended up being a 1 up victory by Reed with a birdie on 18. If Hamm had been chosen the result would have been a 2 up victory for Hamm with birdies on 17 and 18. If Ciboch had been chosen the result would have been a 3&2 victory for Trayys. In the first 4 rounds the players available to be chosen shot: Hale: -30 Reed: -44 Hamm: -41 Ciboch: -28 Lane: -50 What this tells you is that it was a complete toss up for Mike to choose a player to represent you especially then the match was nearly forfeited. Had the Lane/Trayys match got doubled down surely you would have felt better going into it after Lane shot -50 through team play, 4 shots better than Trayys' -46 yet that match ended with the worst result for your team. This was a fun team event that had a lot of work go on behind the scenes to make happen, especially with some of the curveballs thrown mid event and your b%&ing is rude to those that put this on and frankly you come off as a whiny sore loser with your post.
i mean i felt i was being civil, and just bringing up issues I HAD with this. i wasnt calling anyone out, i wasnt attacking anyone. no one knew any details until they are told to me here, after the fact. that was my initial issue. a short announcement in a thread doesnt really explain a lot. so, if you do everything in PMs and then expect to not have a hint of speculation, then idk what to tell you.
but if we want to do this "oh you are just b***hing because you lost stuff, then fine. even though i clearly said i had brought some of this up BEFORE round 5, when we were still up by like 4. so, dismiss whatever i say with a generic label, doesnt change anything. at the end of the day, this is dominated by people who are buddy buddy, and on first name basis with everyone else. so an odd man outs opinion shouldnt really matter any way. it was just my 2 cents from someone who was kept in the dark the whole time, until there was something to announce.
and it was really a "toss up", hmm 3 guys who broke -40s and -50, or a -30 or -28. idk may need to flip a coin there.....
|
|
|
Post by TheDominator273 on Sept 8, 2019 1:16:19 GMT -5
So the match in question is Trayys vs Hale yes? Trayys and Lane were already playing a match so throw that name out leaving a choice beforehand of Reed, Hale, Hamm and Ciboch. Against Hale as we know the result already, a 5&4 win for Trayys. Had Reed been chosen the result would have ended up being a 1 up victory by Reed with a birdie on 18. If Hamm had been chosen the result would have been a 2 up victory for Hamm with birdies on 17 and 18. If Ciboch had been chosen the result would have been a 3&2 victory for Trayys. In the first 4 rounds the players available to be chosen shot: Hale: -30 Reed: -44 Hamm: -41 Ciboch: -28 Lane: -50 What this tells you is that it was a complete toss up for Mike to choose a player to represent you especially then the match was nearly forfeited. Had the Lane/Trayys match got doubled down surely you would have felt better going into it after Lane shot -50 through team play, 4 shots better than Trayys' -46 yet that match ended with the worst result for your team. This was a fun team event that had a lot of work go on behind the scenes to make happen, especially with some of the curveballs thrown mid event and your b%&ing is rude to those that put this on and frankly you come off as a whiny sore loser with your post.
i mean i felt i was being civil, and just bringing up issues I HAD with this. i wasnt calling anyone out, i wasnt attacking anyone. no one knew any details until they are told to me here, after the fact. that was my initial issue. a short announcement in a thread doesnt really explain a lot. so, if you do everything in PMs and then expect to now have a hint of speculation, then idk what to tell you.
but if we want to do this "oh you are just b***hing because you lost stuff, then fine. even though i clearly said i had brought some of this up BEFORE round 5, when we were still up by like 4. so, dismiss whatever i say with a generic label, doesnt change anything. at the end of the day, this is dominated by people who are buddy buddy, and on first name basis with everyone else. so an odd man outs opinion shouldnt really matter any way. it was just my 2 cents from someone who was kept in the dark the whole time, until there was something to announce.
and it was really a "toss up", hmm 3 gyts who broke -40s and -50, or a -30 or -28. idk may need to flip a coin there.....
The -50 took the biggest loss in match play of them all, and toddfather had me by 11 strokes in the team play rounds as well yet I won our match so yes it was very much a toss up as everyone knows anyone can throw up a great round at any time with Beginners clubs. Not to mention the 50:50 odds of a win or a loss based on how scores shook out (Throwing out VctryLnSprts score since he was already slated to play Trayys). You may have brought it up prior to Round 5, but your continued whining here after whining on Twitch is what makes it come across as sour grapes. Accept it for what it is. The organizer and the two captains had every right to decide behind closed doors how to handle the curveballs they were thrown. No matter what they decided I would have supported the decisions because they were the ones doing the most work to run this event and as such I trust their ability to make fair and rational decisions when faced with situations that come up. As far as the buddy buddy sh%$, yeah a lot of us know each other from either years being a part of the community, hanging out on each other's streams or some combination of the two. If you treat yourself like an outsider you will remain an outsider. There's no trick to becoming one of the gang other than being around and present. There's no one that wouldn't welcome you into the fold with open arms if you wanted to be a part of the buddy buddy group.
|
|
|
Post by tottenhamordie on Sept 8, 2019 1:25:14 GMT -5
i mean i felt i was being civil, and just bringing up issues I HAD with this. i wasnt calling anyone out, i wasnt attacking anyone. no one knew any details until they are told to me here, after the fact. that was my initial issue. a short announcement in a thread doesnt really explain a lot. so, if you do everything in PMs and then expect to now have a hint of speculation, then idk what to tell you.
but if we want to do this "oh you are just b***hing because you lost stuff, then fine. even though i clearly said i had brought some of this up BEFORE round 5, when we were still up by like 4. so, dismiss whatever i say with a generic label, doesnt change anything. at the end of the day, this is dominated by people who are buddy buddy, and on first name basis with everyone else. so an odd man outs opinion shouldnt really matter any way. it was just my 2 cents from someone who was kept in the dark the whole time, until there was something to announce.
and it was really a "toss up", hmm 3 gyts who broke -40s and -50, or a -30 or -28. idk may need to flip a coin there.....
The -50 took the biggest loss in match play of them all, and toddfather had me by 11 strokes in the team play rounds as well yet I won our match so yes it was very much a toss up as everyone knows anyone can throw up a great round at any time with Beginners clubs. Not to mention the 50:50 odds of a win or a loss based on how scores shook out (Throwing out VctryLnSprts score since he was already slated to play Trayys). You may have brought it up prior to Round 5, but your continued whining here after whining on Twitch is what makes it come across as sour grapes. Accept it for what it is. The organizer and the two captains had every right to decide behind closed doors how to handle the curveballs they were thrown. No matter what they decided I would have supported the decisions because they were the ones doing the most work to run this event and as such I trust their ability to make fair and rational decisions when faced with situations that come up. As far as the buddy buddy sh%$, yeah a lot of us know each other from either years being a part of the community, hanging out on each other's streams or some combination of the two. If you treat yourself like an outsider you will remain an outsider. There's no trick to becoming one of the gang other than being around and present. There's no one that wouldn't welcome you into the fold with open arms if you wanted to be a part of the buddy buddy group.
whining? ok man, whatever. some of these have been mutually talked about among a few of us, i am just the one posting them here for all to see. and i dont treat myself like an outsider, i am just too new to be seen as more than a "whining b***h sore loser" over obvious issues. you werent in our war room, so you have no idea how it looks from this side. if this was brought up by any of the well known people here, i bet you wouldnt call them whiners and sore losers and b***hing complainers. i have been around for months now, but any time i have an issue its just cast aside as one mans complaint or "whining". which shows me it obviously takes more than just being in some streams and calling people by their first names. but ill be here for the next generalized label to dismiss anything i say. so have at it.
|
|
|
Post by katana22 on Sept 8, 2019 1:55:37 GMT -5
OK for the love of golf let it go, this was a great Event with a lot of people doing a hell of a lot of work behind the scenes can we all just let the guys that won (not me I'm happy to answer question in a PM) but the guys on my team who made all the hard yards on the course have their 15min in the sun.
|
|
|
Post by katana22 on Sept 8, 2019 2:30:11 GMT -5
1st of let me take the time to thank some people, Doley you made everything a hell of a lot easier for Jeremy, Curtis and I, by letting us use the special events society to use thank very much.
Adam Grove’s course what beautiful track to play on, thank you for the adjustments you made on very short notice.
Jeremy all the work you put into getting this up running, the behind the scenes work, getting all the scores uploaded, the google score sheets, the constant updates and all the help you gave Curtis and myself will not be forgotten you were truly the driving force behind this event, my hat is off to ya mate.
Curtis what can I say but I have never had pleasure of being involved with another Captain of an opposition side who cared more about the event and fairness than winning, thank you for your competitive spirit and sportsmanship throughout this event.
To team Montgomery commiserations guys but you guys made this event one of the most exciting, entertaining and enjoyable events I have even been a part of, no losers on your team everyone’s a winner in my book with the class you all showed.
And lastly to my team mates thanks you guys for dragging my sorry ass around this event you guys earned the win with all your hard work. You made it easy to be a Captain with all the comradery and backing one another up all event long, for you guys to come back from 13-8 down at one point was truly remarkable to be a part of. Thank you Every last one of you and I really mean that.
|
|