|
Post by misternic on Feb 5, 2015 21:38:01 GMT -5
I am 180, so I would need a top 10+
|
|
|
Post by MrSourNinja on Feb 6, 2015 6:44:40 GMT -5
I am 180, so I would need a top 10+ You can do it.
|
|
|
Post by misternic on Feb 6, 2015 9:57:03 GMT -5
I will get back in the "red numbers" of the WGC, but it will be a grind it out more likely and not the big splash. I set my goal to make half the cuts and make it to the top 70 on the PGA, so those are still legit goals... Part of what makes it fun. If I was Doyley this game would stink... win, win, 6th place, win... BORING!
|
|
|
Post by MrSourNinja on Feb 6, 2015 10:00:21 GMT -5
I will get back in the "red numbers" of the WGC, but it will be a grind it out more likely and not the big splash. I set my goal to make half the cuts and make it to the top 70 on the PGA, so those are still legit goals... Part of what makes it fun. If I was Doyley this game would stink... win, win, 6th place, win... BORING! Yeah there is rumors going around that Doyley was thinking about retiring because it's too easy for him
|
|
|
Post by misternic on Feb 6, 2015 12:18:10 GMT -5
I am truly excited to see that we have had 14 different winners in 16 tournaments.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 6, 2015 12:29:27 GMT -5
I am truly excited to see that we have had 14 different winners in 16 tournaments. Considering anyone was only allowed to enter 4 of the 16, that is not overly surprizing.
|
|
|
Post by eMLBCommish on Feb 6, 2015 12:38:59 GMT -5
I am truly excited to see that we have had 14 different winners in 16 tournaments. Considering anyone was only allowed to enter 4 of the 16, that is not overly surprizing. Nic's point is it could have been 4 different winners in 16 tournaments. That there's only a couple multiple winners thus far is a positive.
|
|