Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 18, 2018 20:56:12 GMT -5
Elaborate on Halocene Summit please
|
|
|
Post by mattf27 on Nov 18, 2018 22:12:17 GMT -5
Elaborate on Halocene Summit please There was some interesting ideas in there, and the quality of the work was solid overall, but there were a lot of rough edges and (mainly) I thought it played too goofy to be a tour course. As fantasy courses go it was interesting, but it's always an uphill battle getting those tour ready. Things like teeing off in total blackness in a cave are just a little too out there for me (for a tour course anyways).
|
|
|
Post by Moe Slorkman on Nov 26, 2018 5:53:30 GMT -5
Still waiting to see why Exile Island was marked not approved despite hosting a web.com event in 2017.
Also seeming with was a port with a name change that was marked tour worthy originally someone went to some effort to find it and downgrade it. Human error or someone been childish.........
|
|
|
Post by jacobkessler on Nov 27, 2018 22:58:19 GMT -5
Still waiting to see why Exile Island was marked not approved despite hosting a web.com event in 2017. Also seeming with was a port with a name change that was marked tour worthy originally someone went to some effort to find it and downgrade it. Human error or someone been childish......... Only reason I can see it being rejected is because we were requiring courses already in the database to be ported rather than re-submitted, but we’ve since abandoned that (though we do appreciate clicking the port button) I’ll message you soon but I’ve played the course before, and I agree that it’s worth being approved.
|
|
|
Post by Moe Slorkman on Nov 28, 2018 0:08:05 GMT -5
Still waiting to see why Exile Island was marked not approved despite hosting a web.com event in 2017. Also seeming with was a port with a name change that was marked tour worthy originally someone went to some effort to find it and downgrade it. Human error or someone been childish......... Only reason I can see it being rejected is because we were requiring courses already in the database to be ported rather than re-submitted, but we’ve since abandoned that (though we do appreciate clicking the port button) I’ll message you soon but I’ve played the course before, and I agree that it’s worth being approved. Couldn’t be ported due to name change as mentioned it’s the same course that hosted an event last year no need to play it won’t get used again just want her on the database:)
|
|
|
Post by Moe Slorkman on Nov 28, 2018 8:33:03 GMT -5
All is right in the world again and fixed.
Thank you Kissler
|
|
vladthemert
Amateur Golfer
test
Posts: 237
TGCT Name: Vlad Mert
|
Post by vladthemert on Nov 28, 2018 9:16:12 GMT -5
I have not to dissimilar issue more likely overlooked. I submitted Tai Pan Beach Course yet to have feedback if you approved it or rejected it. One issue when you click on it it goes to someone else is course wonder if what caused it to be missed its a tropical course. I have also submitted another course which now doing the same the course is Uffington White Horse GC when you click on it going to someone else course, is there an issue with hyperlinks on course database.
Finally so long winded sorry the Tai Pan Beach Course is part of a 3 courses the layout has all 37 holes designed as result there is overlays Beach has first eight of Blue which yet to submit. Dragon Course will have 11 Beach holes and back eight of blue. Problem is is it wise to submit all three or just keep one course on tgtours. Not sure any other designer actually done 2 or 3 course complex which has overlapping holes.
Thanks for the reply in advance.
Thanks Uffington been approved
|
|
|
Post by mattf27 on Nov 30, 2018 12:26:46 GMT -5
Autumnwood: Not approved Rough surfacing and terrain sculpting throughout.
|
|
|
Post by mattf27 on Dec 5, 2018 20:12:59 GMT -5
Pinehaven Resort and Casino - not approved There are some decent things going here, but ultimately the surface work is too rough to approve.
|
|
coachrobc
Caddy
Posts: 46
TGCT Name: Robert Carroll
Tour: CC-D/TST
|
Post by coachrobc on Dec 5, 2018 20:13:22 GMT -5
Autumnwood: Not approved Rough surfacing and terrain sculpting throughout. THis has me a little concerned. I an about to release my first course Carroll Creek and have been going back and researching courses that were not approved and trying not to make the same mistakes, I played the first 9 on Autumnwood and same a couple of issues but all in all seemed ok. The rough is a bit too wide around most holes but dies run with the shape of things. Anyway you can message me a few examples so I dont make the same mistakes
|
|
|
Post by gregfordyce on Dec 5, 2018 21:07:48 GMT -5
You Will Not Break Par - not approved.
Some good concepts here, but ultimately overall sculpting and surfacing is just too rough. Edges of fairways are harshly angled, and green contouring is unrealistic in too many places.
|
|
|
Post by mattf27 on Dec 8, 2018 13:10:49 GMT -5
The Sportsman's Club - stadium - not approved Doesn't appear to exist in TGC2019.
|
|
|
Post by mattf27 on Dec 8, 2018 13:13:26 GMT -5
Meteor Quarry 2019 - not approved Rough sculpting and surface work throughout.
|
|
|
Post by mattf27 on Dec 9, 2018 11:02:47 GMT -5
Claddagh Ring 2.0 - not approved Surfacing work is a little rough, and general terrain work needs some help. Very rough and abrupt, affects playability as well. Please stop submitting this course.
|
|
|
Post by mattf27 on Dec 9, 2018 11:13:13 GMT -5
TaylorMade - not approved Fariways/rough appear to be autogenerated, lots of surfacing problems, a couple odd strategy decisions as well.
|
|